A Green Degree

This blog intends to bring a new perspective on all things 'green' and sustainable, covering (mostly) energy, politics, the economy & more, what I feel as the most pressing concerns we face. In short, sustainability needs to progress & become the social everyday. That's my passion, and our solution. Screw business as usual people!













    Join our Mailing List

With Rio+20 long gone, it doesn’t come as much of a surprise to me that most of the global populace has quickly and without bother discarded any knowledge of the convention, as well as the few and flimsy results that come of it, as though the whole thing was one pointless affair. 

You could easily be fooled into thinking this is the case, considering so little of any worth, useful to effectively nobody matured from the talks, of which a large majority of the human race were crossing their fingers in the hope of a final resolution on all our woes and sufferings. Yes, there were a few pieces here and there, and the aptly-named ‘Future We Want’ paper was signed, but you only have to look a little further to see that anything with possible leanings towards a solid commitment and legal bindings within text was literally wiped away, replaced by ‘ifs’ and ‘taking steps towards’. 

So coming from this, I felt it prudent to look back on one of the key agreements signed and ratified under the ancestor of this failed attempt at global democracy, the Rio 1992 Declaration, which actually managed to achieve what practically all other conventions that have come our way have failed to reproduce since - something worthwhile to the global community, which has stuck to this day and actually made an impact on ALL of our lives. 

The ‘polluter pays’ principle is at its most basic, a very simple law pertaining to pollution from industry, whereby those who pollute must pay for the damage and degradation they bring upon the surrounding environment, whether it be through monetary forms (hard cash), incentives or compensation, effectively ‘making up’ for their shortsightedness.

This principle had one major point when it was conceived and globally upheld, namely that the inclusion of ‘pollution’ meant such things as fertilisers or insecticides, but has been rapidly adapted since to include greenhouse gases which pollute the atmosphere, for instance methane or CFCs. Due to this principle, and many others working in tandem, values of damaging pollutants in the environment has dropped significantly, and we have been able to see a tangible change in our way of life involving these materials. 

Read More

Posted at 10:23am and tagged with: polluter pays, pollution, Environment, energy, dirty, coal, oil, gas, green, renewable, Rio+20, rio 92, global, market, carbon, price, money, science, government, atmosphere, global warming, GHG, CFC, methane, fertiliser, agriculture,.

The past week has been a bit of roller-coaster for the solar industry, with some rather large ups and a potentially even larger down. As it stands, solar is either teetering on the edge of a steep cliff, ready to drop into possible failure and public outcry, or it may be just months away from its crowning moment.

First on the agenda, I’ll get the bad out of the way, leave you folks with the nice sciencey stuff last.

China has been causing a stir in the solar panel market for the past couple of months, with some of its largest companies, such as the infamous Suntech, being accused of accepting rather lucrative and un-competititve subsidies through the Chinese government, allowing the company to make panels at low low prices and flood the international market without much stress on their part.

Obviously, the US jumped straight in to defend their maturing solar industry and the vested interests of First Solar, its largest manufacturer of panels, on the grounds that this unfair marketing was taking sales away from America and skewing the market towards Asia. This story blew up in size as more countries came to see the issues of both sides, and China came under scrutiny over the subsidies and tax-breaks, of which they of course denied, stating they were fair and within trade law.

Since then, I’d heard little until this week, when the US decided to impose trade tariffs on Chinese solar manufacturers, to the tune of between 2.9% and 4.73%. These figures were in all honesty a relief to many thinking that much higher rates would be decided, crippling the Chinese industry in the long-term. This is an admittedly depressing setback at a time when solar needs all the momentum it can get to smash through the fossil fuel lobbies and slap itself on every roof it can, and is based on purely US-centric economic stances to do with ‘flooding the market’. In my opinion, and I’m sure many agree (?) that it doesn’t matter where the solar panels come from, as long as global kWh prices are falling and interest increasing, which are far as I know, generally are.

Read More

Posted at 11:04am and tagged with: solar, china, trade, tariff, energy, science, graphene, technology, material science, efficiency, money, price, 2020, suntech, US, tax,.